March may come in like a lion and go out like a lamb, but for many New York Metropolitan area commuters, March is bringing something different: a new transit fare increase.
Starting in March, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority will be hiking its fares for all its passengers on most of its subsidiaries, including the Long Island Railroad. According to an MTA press release, the base fare for the subway and bus services will be increased by 25 cents to $2.75 for single-use riders while the 30-Day Unlimited Ride MetroCard will be bumped up to $116.50 and the 7-Day Unlimited Ride MetroCard to $31.
LIRR commuters will not be left out of the MTA’s latest efforts to balance its budget. Weekly and monthly LIRR tickets will increase by 4.25 percent, leaving frequent commuters either feeling down about the hike or embracing it as a necessary evil.
8 thoughts on “MTA Fares Rise, Commuter Morale Falls”
Great article! I think the fare increase sucks! Any increase primarily impacts people who can least afford to spend more on their commute – including students, under – and unemployed individuals. This is a temporary solution because the MTA will still have a deficit and increase fares in another few years!
I have survived many fare increases, but there is little, if any substantive change. This isn’t London, for example, with impeccable stations and service. I shudder to think of where this is headed. I don’t particularly mind high fares, but give us some value. Thanks for piping in, amiga.
I’m not sure this addresses any actual issues the MTA faces. However, given what it would cost to drive and park in the city it still seems affordable. But I don’t think MTA is thinking long term.
I’ve never lived in this area; actually I’ve never lived in the north east. However, I don’t believe that it is a prerequisite to have an opinion on this situation. I grew up in Europe so public transportation is nothing new for me. In my opinion the fare hike poses a couple debatable issue. There are two basis reasons why people choose pubic transportation: saving money and saving time.
For those individuals who chose public transportation for financial reasons, the fare increase is a major set back. Most of those individuals are already on a very tight budget. Even a seemingly insignificants fare hike of $0.25 may ruin such individual’s budget (daily round trip would result in a roughly $15.00 increase in monthly budget.).
For many people, especially students, $15.00 is half of their weekly grocery budget.
The delayed train schedule poses is a significant problem for those who choose public transportation to save unproductive time behind the wheel and parking fees. However, since many of the trains are overcrowded and regularly run behind the schedule, the aimed for benefit is not only lost, but also creates risks of missing important meetings or being perceived as an unreliable employee.
However, no matter what is the reason and consequences of choosing public transportation, the fare hike is a result of the problem which cannot be fixed by fare hike and should not be shifted to the customers. It appears that this is recurring problem and its solution is frequently shifted to the customer. It is clear that MTA has a budget issues that need to be addressed and resolved internally, not shifted to the customers. Putting a “band aid” over a serious “infection” is not going to cure and permanently fix the real cause of the “infection”.
I am very impressed with the way this article is written. It provides the facts and leaves the conclusions to the reader. The photos capture the essence of the story, give it a human face and make it very powerful! Excellent job!
I don’t ride the subway all that often, but do feel that the fare hike is completely unnecessary especially when the service for both the MTA and LIRR could be improved!
Great article! I think the fare increase sucks! Any increase primarily impacts people who can least afford to spend more on their commute – including students, under – and unemployed individuals. This is a temporary solution because the MTA will still have a deficit and increase fares in another few years!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have survived many fare increases, but there is little, if any substantive change. This isn’t London, for example, with impeccable stations and service. I shudder to think of where this is headed. I don’t particularly mind high fares, but give us some value. Thanks for piping in, amiga.
LikeLike
I’m not sure this addresses any actual issues the MTA faces. However, given what it would cost to drive and park in the city it still seems affordable. But I don’t think MTA is thinking long term.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve never lived in this area; actually I’ve never lived in the north east. However, I don’t believe that it is a prerequisite to have an opinion on this situation. I grew up in Europe so public transportation is nothing new for me. In my opinion the fare hike poses a couple debatable issue. There are two basis reasons why people choose pubic transportation: saving money and saving time.
For those individuals who chose public transportation for financial reasons, the fare increase is a major set back. Most of those individuals are already on a very tight budget. Even a seemingly insignificants fare hike of $0.25 may ruin such individual’s budget (daily round trip would result in a roughly $15.00 increase in monthly budget.).
For many people, especially students, $15.00 is half of their weekly grocery budget.
The delayed train schedule poses is a significant problem for those who choose public transportation to save unproductive time behind the wheel and parking fees. However, since many of the trains are overcrowded and regularly run behind the schedule, the aimed for benefit is not only lost, but also creates risks of missing important meetings or being perceived as an unreliable employee.
However, no matter what is the reason and consequences of choosing public transportation, the fare hike is a result of the problem which cannot be fixed by fare hike and should not be shifted to the customers. It appears that this is recurring problem and its solution is frequently shifted to the customer. It is clear that MTA has a budget issues that need to be addressed and resolved internally, not shifted to the customers. Putting a “band aid” over a serious “infection” is not going to cure and permanently fix the real cause of the “infection”.
I am very impressed with the way this article is written. It provides the facts and leaves the conclusions to the reader. The photos capture the essence of the story, give it a human face and make it very powerful! Excellent job!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very informative!! I understand the need to increase fares from time to time, but 5 times in the past 10 years is a bit much.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Shawn!
LikeLike
I don’t ride the subway all that often, but do feel that the fare hike is completely unnecessary especially when the service for both the MTA and LIRR could be improved!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh Lulu, if only there were a connection between service and fare hikes! So sad can’t wait to leave NY!!
LikeLike